This note is one of many taken during 2025
Partial sums of the Geometric Series+
So, the geometric series: if you’ve taken some Calculus, you know of it.
r=1+x+x2+x3+…Solve for
r
r=1+rx
r−rx=1
r(1−x)=1
r=1−x1And there’s the formula the textbook gave ya'
j=0∑∞xj=1−x1But what about the partial sums?
j=0∑nxj=?Decompose into difference of sums
j=0∑nxj=j=0∑∞xj−j=n+1∑∞xjWe know the value of the left sum, and the right sum can be found similarly.
h=xn+1+xn+2+xn+3+…
h=xn+1+x(xn+1+xn+2+…)
h=xn+1+x(h)
h=1−xxn+1So the partial sum can be found
j=0∑nxj=1−x1−1−xxn+1=1−x1−xn+1Some alternate forms are common
j=0∑n−1xj=1−x1−xn=x−1xn−1Also note that, now that the upper bound of the sum is not infinity, the sum is defined for values
∣x∣≥1
Partial Extended-Geometric Sums
This also applies to series like
x1+x4+x7+x10+…or in general terms where
a>b≥0
r=xa+b+x2a+b+x3a+b+…Finding a closed form for this is not too much more difficult.
First find the closed for to the simpler
h=xa+x2a+x3a+…
h=xa(1+xa+x2a+…)
h=xa+xah
h=1−xaxaNow the more complex form can be found
r=xa+b+x2a+b+x3a+b+…
r=xa+b+x2a+b+x3a+b+…
r=xb(xa+x2a+x3a+…)
r=xbh=1−xaxa+b
j=1∑∞xaj+b=1−xaxa+bFollowing similar reasoning as the regular geometric series, the partial form is found.
m=xan+b+xa(n+1)+b+xa(n+2)+b+…
m=xb(xan+xa(n+1)+xa(n+2)+…)
m=xb(xan+xa(n+1)+xa(n+2)+…)Pause solving
m, introduce new equation,
t
t=xan+xa(n+1)+xa(n+2)+…
t=xan+xan+1a+xan+2a+…
t=xan(1+x1a+x2a+…)Pause solving
t, introduce new equation
o
o=xa+x2a+x3a+…
o=xa(1+o)
o=1−xaxaResume solving
t
t=xan(1+x1a+x2a+…)
t=xan(1+1−xaxa)
t=xan1−xa1Resume solving
m
m=xb(xan+xa(n+1)+xa(n+2)+…)
m=1−xaxan+bThus
j=n∑∞xaj+b=1−xaxan+bSo
j=1∑n−1xaj+b=j=1∑∞xaj+b−j=n∑∞xaj+b
j=1∑n−1xaj+b=1−xaxa+b−1−xaxan+b=1−xaxa+b−xan+b=1−xaxa+b(1−xa(n−1))For convenience, increment the value of
n by one.
j=1∑nxaj+b=1−xaxa+b(1−xan)When
0≤b<a
I’m not sure if any of that made any sense, but from my bit of verification, I believe it’s true.
As far as verification goes, it wouldn’t hurt to do so through Induction.
First the base case of
n=1
j=1∑1xaj+b=xa+b
1−xaxa+b(1−xa)The base case is satisfied
The equation is valid if the following holds
1−xaxa+b(1−xan)+xa(n+1)+b=1−xaxa+b(1−xa(n+1))
xa+b(1−xan)+xa(n+1)+b(1−xa)=xa+b(1−xa(n+1))
xa+b−xa(n+1)+b+xa(n+1)+b(1−xa)=xa+b−xa(n+2)+b
xa+b−xa(n+1)+b+xa(n+1)+b−xa(n+2)+b=xa+b−xa(n+2)+b
xa+b−xa(n+1)+b+xa(n+1)+b−xa(n+2)+b=xa+b−xa(n+2)+bAnd so it has been proven.
This note is one of many taken during 2025